15
2025/26 LDCC U14 T20 Bird - Season Summary
Team Record
3
11
1
1015
1330
-1.74
Match Margins
Season Awards
19 boundaries
Avg 5.3
3/4
Batting Leaderboard
| # | Player | Mat | Inn | Runs | HS | Avg | SR | BF | 4s | 6s | Dis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | T de Meyrick | 12 | 12 | 162 | 30 | 23.14 | 72.65 | 223 | 19 | 0 | 7 |
| 2 | B Negus | 10 | 10 | 99 | 26 | 16.5 | 86.09 | 115 | 12 | 0 | 6 |
| 3 | H Lunn | 12 | 12 | 98 | 25 | 10.89 | 64.05 | 153 | 9 | 3 | 9 |
| 4 | H Lennon | 12 | 12 | 79 | 27 | 7.9 | 62.7 | 126 | 13 | 0 | 10 |
| 5 | C Beaman | 9 | 9 | 74 | 23 | 18.5 | 54.41 | 136 | 8 | 0 | 4 |
| 6 | P Lawrance | 10 | 10 | 62 | 17 | 8.86 | 46.62 | 133 | 11 | 0 | 7 |
| 7 | O Walter | 11 | 11 | 61 | 17 | 8.71 | 51.69 | 118 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| 8 | L Mills | 11 | 11 | 47 | 25 | 5.22 | 61.84 | 76 | 6 | 0 | 9 |
| 9 | J Tesoriero | 13 | 13 | 43 | 13 | 3.58 | 53.09 | 81 | 4 | 0 | 12 |
| 10 | N Atkinson | 10 | 10 | 42 | 14 | 4.67 | 43.75 | 96 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| 11 | S Miles | 6 | 6 | 32 | 8 | 8.0 | 33.68 | 95 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| 12 | H Berry | 11 | 11 | 15 | 5 | 1.67 | 26.32 | 57 | 1 | 0 | 9 |
Top Partnerships
| # | Runs | Wicket | Batters | Match Score | vs | Round |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 44 | 4th | B Negus & L Mills | 106 | LCCC/St Ives U15 Ponting | R10 |
| 2 | 43 | 1st | T de Meyrick & C Beaman | 105 | LCCC/St Ives U15 Ponting | R3 |
| 3 | 37 | 2nd | T de Meyrick & S Miles | 86 | Gordon Green U15 T20 | R7 |
| 4 | 36 | 6th | T de Meyrick & H Lunn | 80 | Mosman U14 Cummins | R5 |
| 5 | 35 | 5th | T de Meyrick & L Mills | 72 | Mosman U15 Border | R6 |
| 6 | 32 | 4th | H Berry & H Lennon | 105 | LCCC/St Ives U15 Ponting | R3 |
| 7 | 31 | 5th | S Miles & H Lunn | 82 | Mosman U15 Border | R13 |
| 8 | 29 | 4th | C Beaman & P Lawrance | 89 | Gordon Green U15 T20 | R14 |
| 9 | 26 | 1st | H Lennon & B Negus | 87 | NS U14 Feilen | R2 |
| 10 | 25 | 3rd | T de Meyrick & N Atkinson | 89 | Gordon Green U15 T20 | R14 |
Bowling Leaderboard
| # | Player | Mat | O | M | Runs | Wkts | Avg | Econ | Wd | NB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | O Walter | 11 | 21.7 | 1 | 98 | 10 | 9.8 | 4.49 | 8 | 6 |
| 2 | T de Meyrick | 8 | 15.2 | 0 | 108 | 10 | 10.8 | 7.04 | 0 | 10 |
| 3 | B Negus | 10 | 20.0 | 2 | 86 | 5 | 17.2 | 4.3 | 3 | 3 |
| 4 | N Atkinson | 9 | 18.0 | 0 | 106 | 4 | 26.5 | 5.89 | 1 | 6 |
| 5 | C Beaman | 9 | 13.7 | 0 | 72 | 4 | 18.0 | 5.2 | 4 | 2 |
| 6 | J Tesoriero | 12 | 24.0 | 5 | 96 | 3 | 32.0 | 4.0 | 13 | 4 |
| 7 | L Mills | 10 | 19.0 | 2 | 121 | 3 | 40.33 | 6.37 | 5 | 5 |
| 8 | H Lennon | 11 | 18.5 | 0 | 133 | 3 | 44.33 | 7.06 | 15 | 6 |
| 9 | S Miles | 5 | 8.4 | 0 | 51 | 2 | 25.5 | 5.88 | 2 | 1 |
| 10 | P Lawrance | 9 | 18.0 | 0 | 117 | 2 | 58.5 | 6.5 | 11 | 3 |
| 11 | H Berry | 10 | 18.0 | 0 | 131 | 2 | 65.5 | 7.28 | 7 | 4 |
| 12 | H Lunn | 12 | 24.0 | 0 | 156 | 1 | 156.0 | 6.5 | 2 | 1 |
Best Bowling Figures
| # | Player | Figures | Overs | Maidens | vs | Round |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | O Walter | 3/4 | 2.4 | 0 | NS U14 Feilen | R16 |
| 2 | T de Meyrick | 3/7 | 2.0 | 0 | LCCC U14 Boys Waugh | R1 |
| 3 | B Negus | 2/0 | 2.0 | 2 | LCCC U14 Boys Waugh | R15 |
| 4 | J Tesoriero | 2/0 | 2.0 | 2 | LCCC U14 Boys Waugh | R15 |
| 5 | P Lawrance | 2/4 | 2.0 | 0 | LCCC/St Ives U15 Ponting | R10 |
| 6 | B Negus | 2/4 | 2.0 | 0 | LCCC/St Ives U15 Ponting | R10 |
| 7 | O Walter | 2/8 | 2.0 | 0 | Mosman U14 Cummins | R12 |
| 8 | T de Meyrick | 2/10 | 2.0 | 0 | LCCC/St Ives U15 Ponting | R3 |
| 9 | O Walter | 2/12 | 2.0 | 0 | Mosman U14 Cummins | R5 |
| 10 | T de Meyrick | 2/17 | 2.0 | 0 | Mosman U15 Border | R6 |
Fielding Summary
| # | Player | Mat | Catches | WK Catches | Run Outs | Assisted RO | Stumpings | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | O Walter | 11 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
| 2 | T de Meyrick | 12 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| 3 | H Lunn | 12 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| 4 | C Beaman | 9 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| 5 | L Mills | 11 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 6 | J Tesoriero | 13 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 7 | B Negus | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 8 | H Lennon | 12 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 9 | P Lawrance | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Fun Stats
105
+24
14
106/4
29/4
10
52.2%
J Tesoriero - 8
H Berry - 6
N Atkinson - 5
Dot Ball Survivors
The players who ground it out the most — facing dot balls and living to tell the tale.
114 dot balls
14 consecutive dots
Dot Ball Leaderboard
| # | Player | Dots Faced | Balls Faced | Dot % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | T de Meyrick | 114 | 202 | 56.4% |
| 2 | P Lawrance | 91 | 122 | 74.6% |
| 3 | H Lunn | 83 | 138 | 60.1% |
| 4 | O Walter | 74 | 114 | 64.9% |
| 5 | C Beaman | 73 | 125 | 58.4% |
| 6 | N Atkinson | 69 | 91 | 75.8% |
| 7 | H Lennon | 69 | 109 | 63.3% |
| 8 | S Miles | 67 | 90 | 74.4% |
| 9 | B Negus | 49 | 105 | 46.7% |
| 10 | J Tesoriero | 45 | 76 | 59.2% |
| 11 | L Mills | 42 | 69 | 60.9% |
| 12 | H Berry | 39 | 52 | 75.0% |
Partnership Kings
Individual partnership stats derived from ball-by-ball data — who was at the crease when the runs flowed? Partnership totals include all extras.
Individual Partnership Totals
Personal batting runs scored in partnerships across the season (individual contribution is bat runs only; partnership totals include extras).
| # | Player | Total Runs | Partnerships | Avg Partnership | Biggest |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | T de Meyrick | 162 | 20 | 8.1 | 26 |
| 2 | B Negus | 99 | 16 | 6.2 | 16 |
| 3 | H Lunn | 98 | 15 | 6.5 | 17 |
| 4 | H Lennon | 79 | 14 | 5.6 | 27 |
| 5 | C Beaman | 74 | 17 | 4.4 | 16 |
| 6 | P Lawrance | 62 | 13 | 4.8 | 14 |
| 7 | O Walter | 61 | 14 | 4.4 | 15 |
| 8 | L Mills | 47 | 10 | 4.7 | 23 |
| 9 | J Tesoriero | 43 | 12 | 3.6 | 13 |
| 10 | N Atkinson | 40 | 8 | 5.0 | 11 |
| 11 | S Miles | 32 | 11 | 2.9 | 8 |
| 12 | H Berry | 15 | 8 | 1.9 | 5 |
Best Batting Pairs
Which two players combined for the most runs when batting together across the season.
| # | Pair | Combined Runs | Times Together | Avg Partnership | Biggest |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | T de Meyrick & C Beaman | 76 | 4 | 19.0 | 43 |
| 2 | B Negus & L Mills | 63 | 3 | 21.0 | 44 |
| 3 | T de Meyrick & S Miles | 58 | 3 | 19.3 | 37 |
| 4 | T de Meyrick & H Lunn | 50 | 2 | 25.0 | 36 |
| 5 | C Beaman & H Lunn | 45 | 3 | 15.0 | 24 |
| 6 | C Beaman & O Walter | 44 | 3 | 14.7 | 22 |
| 7 | T de Meyrick & L Mills | 41 | 2 | 20.5 | 35 |
| 8 | S Miles & H Lunn | 40 | 2 | 20.0 | 31 |
| 9 | O Walter & B Negus | 38 | 3 | 12.7 | 18 |
| 10 | H Lunn & J Tesoriero | 37 | 3 | 12.3 | 23 |
Extras Machine
In U12 cricket, wides and no-balls are not re-bowled — so extras matter. A lot.
122
9.6%
Most Generous
Bowlers who gave away the most wides + no-balls
| # | Bowler | Wd | NB | Total | Overs | Extras/Ov |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | H Lennon | 15 | 6 | 21 | 18.5 | 1.12 |
| 2 | J Tesoriero | 13 | 4 | 17 | 24.0 | 0.71 |
| 3 | O Walter | 8 | 6 | 14 | 21.7 | 0.64 |
| 4 | P Lawrance | 11 | 3 | 14 | 18.0 | 0.78 |
| 5 | H Berry | 7 | 4 | 11 | 18.0 | 0.61 |
Most Disciplined
Fewest extras per over (min 3 overs bowled)
| # | Bowler | Wd | NB | Total | Overs | Extras/Ov |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | H Lunn | 2 | 1 | 3 | 24.0 | 0.12 |
| 2 | B Negus | 3 | 3 | 6 | 20.0 | 0.3 |
| 3 | S Miles | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8.4 | 0.35 |
| 4 | N Atkinson | 1 | 6 | 7 | 18.0 | 0.39 |
| 5 | C Beaman | 4 | 2 | 6 | 13.7 | 0.43 |
Extras % of Runs Conceded
What share of runs conceded were extras? (min 2 overs)
| # | Bowler | Extras | Runs | Extras % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | J Tesoriero | 17 | 96 | 17.7% |
| 2 | H Lennon | 21 | 133 | 15.8% |
| 3 | O Walter | 14 | 98 | 14.3% |
| 4 | P Lawrance | 14 | 117 | 12.0% |
| 5 | T de Meyrick | 10 | 108 | 9.3% |
Extras Beneficiaries
Batters who had the most wides + no-balls bowled to them
| # | Batter | Wd | NB | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | T de Meyrick | 13 | 10 | 23 |
| 2 | H Lennon | 15 | 3 | 18 |
| 3 | H Lunn | 7 | 9 | 16 |
| 4 | B Negus | 10 | 1 | 11 |
| 5 | P Lawrance | 6 | 5 | 11 |
Rotation Fairness Index
How evenly batting positions were distributed across the squad over 12 non-finals matches (12 players).
81.1
0.108
12
Position Distribution Matrix
How many times each player batted at each position. Higher variety = better rotation.
| Player | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Inn | Uniq | Variety |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C Beaman | 9 | 4 | |||||||||||
| T de Meyrick | 10 | 5 | |||||||||||
| H Lunn | 10 | 6 | |||||||||||
| O Walter | 8 | 5 | |||||||||||
| B Negus | 8 | 5 | |||||||||||
| P Lawrance | 8 | 5 | |||||||||||
| J Tesoriero | 8 | 5 | |||||||||||
| N Atkinson | 7 | 5 | |||||||||||
| H Berry | 7 | 5 | |||||||||||
| H Lennon | 7 | 6 | |||||||||||
| L Mills | 8 | 7 | |||||||||||
| S Miles | 5 | 5 |
Bowling Opportunity Equity
How evenly bowling overs were distributed across the squad over the season, using ball-by-ball data. In U12 cricket, all players except 2 must bowl at least 2 overs per match — this shows the season-long picture.
Good
202.5
16.5
Heavy Workload
Players who bowled 30%+ more than fair share
| Player | Overs | vs Fair Share |
|---|---|---|
| H Lunn | 23.3 | +39% |
Full Squad Bowling Distribution
| # | Player | Overs | Mat Bowled | Mat Played | Bowl % | Ov/Match | vs Fair Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | H Lunn | 23.3 | 12 | 12 | 100% | 2.0 | +39% |
| 2 | J Tesoriero | 21.3 | 12 | 13 | 92% | 1.8 | +27% |
| 3 | O Walter | 20.2 | 11 | 11 | 100% | 1.8 | +20% |
| 4 | B Negus | 19.0 | 10 | 10 | 100% | 1.9 | +12% |
| 5 | L Mills | 17.3 | 10 | 11 | 91% | 1.8 | 4% |
| 6 | H Berry | 16.5 | 10 | 11 | 91% | 1.7 | 0% |
| 7 | P Lawrance | 16.4 | 9 | 10 | 90% | 1.9 | -1% |
| 8 | N Atkinson | 16.2 | 9 | 10 | 90% | 1.8 | -3% |
| 9 | H Lennon | 16.1 | 11 | 12 | 92% | 1.5 | -4% |
| 10 | T de Meyrick | 13.4 | 8 | 12 | 67% | 1.7 | -19% |
| 11 | C Beaman | 13.1 | 9 | 9 | 100% | 1.5 | -22% |
| 12 | S Miles | 8.1 | 5 | 6 | 83% | 1.6 | -52% |
Season Progression
Comparing the first 6 matches to the last 7 matches.
| Metric | First Half | Second Half | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win/Loss | 0W / 7L | 3W / 4L | Improving |
| Avg Score | 83.0 | 73.9 | -9.1 |
| Avg Conceded | 125.8 | 82.1 | -43.7 |
| Runs Scored | 498 | 517 | +19 |
| Wickets Taken | 24 | 31 | +7 |
Most Improved Batters
Players whose batting average improved most from first half to second half (min 2 innings each half).
| # | Player | 1st Half Avg | 2nd Half Avg | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | O Walter | 1.6 | 26.5 | +24.9 |
| 2 | N Atkinson | 1.5 | 11.0 | +9.5 |
| 3 | H Lunn | 6.8 | 14.2 | +7.4 |
| 4 | J Tesoriero | 0.2 | 7.0 | +6.8 |
| 5 | L Mills | 5.0 | 5.3 | +0.3 |
Team of the Season XI
| # | Player | Role | Key Stats |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | C Beaman | Opener |
74 runs @ 18.5
4 wkts, Econ 5.2
2 ct, 2 ro
Opened 56% of innings | 9 matches | HS 23
|
| 2 | H Lennon | Opener |
79 runs @ 7.9
3 wkts, Econ 7.1
2 ct
Opened 38% of innings | 12 matches | HS 27
|
| 3 | B Negus | Middle Order |
99 runs @ 16.5
5 wkts, Econ 4.3
2 ct
10 matches | HS 26
|
| 4 | H Lunn | Middle Order |
98 runs @ 10.9
1 wkts, Econ 6.5
3 ct, 2 ro
12 matches | HS 25
|
| 5 | J Tesoriero | Middle Order |
43 runs @ 3.6
3 wkts, Econ 4.0
1 ct, 3 wk ct
13 matches | HS 13
|
| 6 | O Walter AR | All-rounder |
61 runs @ 8.7
10 wkts, Econ 4.5
6 ct, 1 ro
AR score 69 | 11 matches | HS 17
|
| 7 | T de Meyrick WK | Wicket Keeper |
162 runs @ 23.1
10 wkts, Econ 7.0
1 wk ct, 1 st, 2 ro
Kept in 4 innings | 12 matches | HS 30
|
| 8 | L Mills AR | All-rounder |
47 runs @ 5.2
3 wkts, Econ 6.4
4 ct
AR score 47 | 11 matches | HS 25
|
| 9 | N Atkinson | Bowler |
42 runs @ 4.7
4 wkts, Econ 5.9
10 matches | HS 14
|
| 10 | S Miles | Bowler |
32 runs @ 8.0
2 wkts, Econ 5.9
6 matches | HS 8
|
| 11 | P Lawrance | Bowler |
62 runs @ 8.9
2 wkts, Econ 6.5
1 ro
10 matches | HS 17
|